https://doi.org/10.24928/2020/0135

Takt Performance Indicators

Celine G. Haugen¹, Ola Lædre² & Sigmund Aslesen³

¹MSc student, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway, +47 970 43 033, [email protected], orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-9616
²Professor, dr. ing. , Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), [email protected], orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-8299
³Head of Research and Improvement, Veidekke AS, P.O. Box 506 Skøyen, N-0214 Oslo, Norway; [email protected], orcid.org/0000-0002-5097-2794

Abstract

There is a general perception among researchers that the practice of takt varies within projects. Takt planning relies on collaboration between the production team members, who transform a production strategy into a production schedule. One of the goals of the method is to create flow, and hereby allow construction processes to be efficiently executed. Workflow within construction has been measured with different methods: observation, self-evaluation and Last Planner™ System (LPS). To achieve workflow, challenges must be removed. Hence, the novel contribution of this paper is to highlight (1) general challenges expected during the takt plan-execution and (2) takt performance indicators that reveal these challenges. After a longitudinal case study, this paper presents 16 challenges and 7 indicators which together give a foundation for further research of workflow within other Takt Planning and Takt Control-projects.

Keywords

Takt Planning and Takt Control (TPTC), Workflow, Standardization, Lean construction, Performance indicators

Files

Reference

Haugen, C. G. , Lædre, O. & Aslesen, S. 2020. Takt Performance Indicators , Proc. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC) , 457-468. doi.org/10.24928/2020/0135

Download: BibTeX | RIS Format