TY - CONF TI - Stabilizing Craft Labor Workflow With Instantaneous Progress Reporting C1 - Perth, Australia C3 - 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction SP - 43 EP - 52 PY - 2015 AU - Rios, Fernanda Cruz AU - Grau, David AU - Assainar, Rizwan AU - Ganapathy, Ram AU - Diosdado, Jose AD - PhD student, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 660 S. College Ave., Tempe, AZ 85287- 0204, USA, Phone +1 (520) 328-7755; email: fcrios@asu.edu AD - Assistant Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 660 S. College Ave., Tempe, AZ 85287- 0204, USA, Phone +1 (480) 727-0665; email: david.grau@asu.edu AD - M.S. student, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 660 S. College Ave, Tempe, AZ 85287- 0204, USA; email: rassaina@asu.edu AD - Senior BIM Engineer, DPR Construction, 222 N. 44th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034; Phone +1 (602) 333-1865; email: ramg@dpr.com AD - BIM Specialist, DPR Construction, 222 N. 44th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034; Phone +1 (602) 333- 1865; email: josed@dpr.com ED - Seppänen, Olli ED - González, Vicente A. ED - Arroyo, Paz AB - Stabilizing workflow is a common goal of research in lean construction, productivity, and production control methods. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the combination of location-based work packaging and near real-time progress reporting contributes to reducing workflow variability. Some authors agree that daily monitoring allows timely actions to correct deviations from the baseline, which can increase workflow reliability. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate this statement in practice. The drywall installation in a healthcare facility served as the scenario for the test study. Drywall activities were divided into multiple tasks. Tasks were associated with locations and individually monitored. Although drywall tasks with unresolved constraints with mechanical activities did experience variations, a comprehensive analysis showed that most variations of workflow were proactively reduced. KW - Workflow KW - variability KW - lean KW - project controls KW - productivity KW - real-time. PB - T2 - 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction DA - 2015/07/29 CY - Perth, Australia L1 - http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/1224/pdf L2 - http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/1224 N1 - Export Date: 16 April 2024 DB - IGLC.net DP - IGLC LA - English ER -