IGLC.net
EXPORT DATE: 19 June 2026

@CONFERENCE{Blesto2026,
author={Blesto, Gerardus and Kasih, Richardus N. and Utomo, Budi and Saragih, Gregory F. },
editor={Hamzeh, Farook and Poshdar, Mani and Garcia-Lopez,, Nelly P. },
title={EPC pre-execution planning communication: a comparative analysis of four approaches}, 
journal={Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 34)}, 
booktitle={Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 34)}, 
year={2026},
pages={1276-1287},
url={http://www.iglc.net/papers/details/2574},
doi={10.24928/2026/0295},
affiliation={Consultant, PQI Consultant, Jakarta, Indonesia, gerardusblesto@pqiconsultant.com, orcid.org/0009-0004-8848-2151 ; MS Student, Civil and Envir. Eng. Dept. and Project Production System Laboratory (P2SL), University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, nugrakasih@berkeley.edu, orcid.org/0009-0001-9821-0481 ; President, Lean Construction Institute Indonesia (LCII), Jakarta, Indonesia, budiutomo@leanconstruction.id, orcid.org/0009-0001-0913-2494 ; MS Student, Civil and Envir. Eng. Dept. and Project Production System Laboratory (P2SL), University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, gregory.saragih@berkeley.edu, orcid.org/0009-0001-4698-3722 },
abstract={Communication during the pre-execution planning phase—encompassing scope definition, schedule development, and procurement strategy before field execution—is critical to the performance of engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) projects, a delivery model in which a single contracting entity assumes integrated responsibility for engineering, procurement, and construction. Conventional EPC pre-execution planning communication is document-centric and contract-driven, providing traceability but limiting timely cross-functional alignment and learning. Three alternative approaches—Lean Construction, Project Production Management (PPM), and Advanced Work Packaging (AWP)—propose distinct mechanisms to improve planning-phase communication. This paper presents a structured comparative analysis of these four approaches using criteria derived from EPC planning challenges, project communication literature, and socio-technical systems theory. The analysis shows that Lean Construction strengthens collaborative commitment, trust, and feedback loops; PPM introduces system-level flow logic and quantitative variability control; and AWP embeds communication within structured work packages aligned to construction needs. While each approach addresses specific limitations, none is sufficient in isolation. The findings are synthesized into an integrated communication architecture positioning Lean, PPM, and AWP as complementary across social, systemic, and procedural dimensions. This study contributes an analytical baseline, a comparison framework, and an integration model to support future research and implementation in EPC projects. },
author_keywords={Collaboration, commitment, trust, EPC projects, pre-execution planning. },
address={Singapore, Singapore },
issn={2789-0015 },
publisher={ },
language={English},
document_type={Conference Paper},
source={IGLC},
}