https://doi.org/10.24928/2025/0128
This paper critically evaluates the evidence of performance improvement within the lean construction literature. Through a systematic review of 1,351 papers presented at the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC) conferences between 2013 and 2024, we identify a significant gap in evidence-based studies explicitly addressing performance improvement, with only 52 papers (3.8%) focus on this critical issue. Our findings highlight a predominant focus on building projects, while infrastructure and industrial sectors remain largely overlooked. Additionally, we classify the various performance metrics used in the literature, revealing a lack of standardisation in measuring project outcomes, which complicates benchmarking efforts. We advocate for the adoption of a consistent performance measurement framework to enable meaningful comparisons across similar projects, facilitating the identification of performance improvement and waste reduction. We argue that a structured, industry-wide approach to benchmarking and performance evaluation is essential for the sustained adoption of lean construction and the realisation of its full benefits.
Lean construction, performance improvement, productivity, measurement, standardisation.
Download: BibTeX | RIS Format
Reference in APA 7th edition format:
Asmone, A. S., Pal, A., Murguia, D., Rathnayake, A. & Middleton, C.. (2025). Where Is the Evidence of Performance Improvement in the Lean Construction Literature?. In Seppänen, O., Koskela, L., & Murata , K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 33) (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.24928/2025/0128
Shortened reference for use in IGLC papers:
Asmone, A. S., Pal, A., Murguia, D., Rathnayake, A. & Middleton, C.. (2025). Where Is the Evidence of Performance Improvement in the Lean Construction Literature?. IGLC33. https://doi.org/10.24928/2025/0128